For empty write queue cases, it is possible to avoid allocation and enqueue
send message structures. Send message initialized on stack and passed to
write handler. If immediate write fails, send message allocated from engine
pool and enqueued.
Use counter helps to simplify logic around port and application free.
Port 'post' function introduced to simplify post execution of particular
function to original port engine's thread.
Write message queue is protected by mutex which makes port write operation
thread safe.
To allow use port from different threads, the first step is to avoid using
port's memory pool for temporary allocations required to send data through
the port. Including but not limited by:
- buffers for data;
- send message structures;
- new mmap fd notifications;
It is still safe to use port memory pool for incoming buffers allocations
because recieve operation bound to single thread.
Worker threads ports need to receive 'remove pid' message to properly handle
application process exit case and finish requests processed by particular
application worker. Main process send 'remove pid' notification to service
thread port only and this message must be 'proxied' to other running engines.
Separate memory pool created for this message. For each engine structure
required to post message to engine allocate from the pool using 'retain'
allocation method. After successfull post structure will be freed using
'release' method. To completely destroy poll one more 'release' should be
called to release initial reference count.
I'm afraid this should be simplified using good old malloc() and free() calls.
Detailed documentation was moved to a separate repository
in order to keep the main repository clean from lots of
documentation edits.
See: http://hg.nginx.org/unit-docs
Do not reuse shared memory segment with different port until this segment
successfully received and indexed on other side. However, segment can be used
to transfer data via the port it was sent at any time.
The previous attempt of fixing this in e5a65b58101f hasn't been really
successful, because the actual memory leak was caused not by the request
parse context itself, but its memory pool.
Updating the router engines list before posting jobs to worker thread
engines is more logical because worker threads may exit after the posting.
However, the previous code was safe because an engine is freed by
the router main thread after worker its thread has exited.
The router process exited abnormally on reconfiguration if number
of worker threads had been decreased on the previous reconfiguration.
Besides the list of router engines should be updated only after a new
configuration joints have been prepared for all engines.
PHP SAPI tries to read body for POST request before registering
header-specific variables. For other methods, read_post_body() called by SAPI
after variables registration.
This closes#10 issue on GitHub.
